Dictionary.com defines culture as “the behaviors and beliefs characteristic of a particular social, ethnic, or age group.” The definition is not wrong, but it is wholly inadequate. Culture is all-encompassing. It is part of the superstructure. The thoughts, ideas, actions, language, arts — every human endeavor or expression is connected to a society’s culture. It is not something static; it evolves, and it is intimately bound to the real and material world.
But where do these “behaviors and beliefs” come from?
The great revolutionary theorist from Guinea-Bissau, Amílcar Cabral, wrote: “Whatever may be the ideological or idealistic characteristics of cultural expression, culture is an essential element of the history of a people. Culture is, perhaps, the product of this history just as the flower is the product of a plant. Like history, or because it is history, culture has as its material base the level of the productive forces and the mode of production.”
Just as everything in nature is in constant change, human thoughts and actions shift to reflect the changing world and the way people interact with it.
Society is organized by that interaction — the manipulation of nature for subsistence. Karl Marx wrote, “By producing their means of subsistence men are indirectly producing their actual material life.” Not every society developed at the same pace or through the same stages, but how a society’s needs are met — and the relation of the producers to the things they produce — is what society is organized around. And because human nature grows out of production, it too is not static.
When Marx said capital comes into the world “dripping from head to foot, from every pore, with blood and dirt,” he was describing the system’s very nature. Private property, from which capitalism sprang, brought with it the subjugation of women and children and the policing of gender and sexuality — everything the patriarchal family needed to pass property from father to son.
The particular history of building up the productive forces in the U.S. — slavery, genocide, the theft of land — has left an indelible blemish on the conscience and consciousness of the society and its people. U.S. capitalist society built its foundation on the super-exploitation of Africans brought as slaves, the stealing of land from Indigenous and Mexican people, and the genocide of Indigenous peoples.
Into the 1960s, segregation was open and legal — many whites refused to swim in the same pool as Black people, or to let their children attend the same schools as Black children. What changed to force desegregation and the other civil rights gains?
It was struggle that changed the equation. When oppressed people and working people struggle against the conditions imposed on them, it affects consciousness as a whole. Old prejudices crumble, and people learn to see past backward ways of thinking.
Here in the U.S., culture is often thought of as artistic output. Artistic output is only one part of culture, but looking at the arts — here, music — is a useful way into the peculiarities of U.S. society.
Jazz musician Miles Davis said of music: “Music is always changing. It changes because of the times and the technology that’s available.” Music is an important part of most people’s lives. Everywhere you go, there is music.
In the U.S. the music that is most pervasive is that of the oppressed. The music of Indigenous people, of Latin America, and above all of Black people and the African Diaspora, predominates. It reflects the struggles of the people. But it too is not free from the overarching culture of capitalism. It speaks of the history of the oppressed, carrying their struggles and beliefs from earlier times, but it also carries the ideals of capitalist society — just as, long ago, it reflected the modes of production and social relations of earlier societies.
Oppressed culture is always under attack and faces heavy scrutiny from capitalist media and society as a whole. Hip-hop music is made the scapegoat for the sexism, racism and homophobia rampant in the U.S.
Whatever contradictions exist in rap music or any of the other elements of hip-hop, the culture is neither the greatest purveyor of those contradictions nor their initiator. It is only infiltrated by the culture that comes with capitalist society.
Hip-hop began not just as party music, but as social commentary. This counterculture — underground in its early days — was a response to the conditions imposed on Black and Puerto Rican youth in New York and inner-city areas across the country in the late 1970s and 1980s. Those conditions included white flight, the beginning of deindustrialization and the decline of the great social movements of the 1960s and 1970s, driven by the boom-and-bust cycle of capitalism.
If the perpetuation of capital requires greater and greater exploitation, especially of oppressed nationalities, then it is natural for countercultures of the exploited — the oppressed and the workers — to arise in capitalist society. This counterculture springs from the desire for freedom from exploitation.
The artistic expression of pop or mass culture can gauge the masses’ willingness to struggle, express the conditions they face, or both at once. The same goes for the culture of the oppressed — those workers who face added discrimination, repression and hardship because of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, so-called legal status or disability.
But the culture of the oppressed faces infiltration not only from the ideals of the ruling class, but also from the dominant layer of society. In the U.S. that layer is white. Because of the history of genocide, land theft and slavery — the original accumulation of capital, which Marx said was better called original expropriation, open robbery — race is always a factor. The historical development of the U.S. and the world has fixed the lens of race firmly in place.
When capitalism is abolished from the earth, new ideas and beliefs will come, and human nature will evolve to reflect the changed social relations and material life.
Additional reading
National Liberation and Culture — by Amílcar Cabral (1970). The Eduardo Mondlane Memorial Lecture, and the source of the passage quoted above: culture as the product of a people’s history, with its material base in the mode of production.
Blues People — by Amiri Baraka, then writing as LeRoi Jones (1963). Black music as the history of an oppressed people — how the changing conditions of Black life, from slavery through jazz, reshaped the music.
- Return to What is Marxism?